Search for: "Mayor of Chicago" Results 1521 - 1540 of 1,985
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2011, 2:48 am
The legal distinction between domicile and residence Maksym v Board of Election Commissioners, appeal from 2010 COEL 020, #1-1-0033Rahm Emanuel’s claim that he is eligible to run for the office of Mayor for the City of Chicago will be considered by the Illinois State Supreme Court shortly. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:39 pm by Joanna Chung
The Illinois Supreme Court ruled 7-0 Thursday that former Obama administration official Rahm Emanuel can run for mayor of the nation's third-largest city. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) The opinion is here; here’s an excerpt from the concluding paragraph:This court’s decision is based on the following and only on the following: (1) what it means to be a resident for election purposes was clearly established long ago, and Illinois law has been consistent on the matter since at least the 19th Century; (2) the novel standard adopted by the appellate court majority is without any foundation in Illinois law; (3) the Board’s factual findings were not… [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 9:12 am
New York ranks as the second-most congested area in the nation behind Chicago, according this year's Urban Mobility report by the Texas Transportation Institute. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:28 pm by Sheri Lewis
Rahm Emanuel's political aspirations to be Chicago's next mayor were derailed on Monday by the Illinois Appellate Court's ruling denying him a place on the February ballot. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm by Jeralyn
While I don't care to see Rahm get elected Mayor of Chicago, I think the appeals court got it wrong. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 2:08 pm by David Lat & Elie Mystal
Chubbs Peterson* Professor Rick Hasen thinks the Illinois Supreme Court is leaning towards letting Rahm Emanuel back into the race for Mayor of Chicago. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:33 am by Eugene Volokh
(I’m not surprised, though, by the involvement; Mayer is headquartered in Chicago, and generally gets involved in lots of the juicy high-profile cases, both there and elsewhere.)UPDATE: The Illinois Supreme Court has stayed the lower court decision, and ordered that “if any ballots are printed while this Court is considering the case, the ballots should include the name of petitioner Rahm Emanuel as a candidate for Mayor of the City of Chicago. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:33 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Rick Hasen has a sensible reaction to the Illinois Appellate Court ruling knocking Rahm Emanuel off the ballot for Chicago Mayor. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:28 pm by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
Whether Emanuel's move to D.C. for a year should affect his mayoral chances is a question for the voters, not the courts, to decide.... [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 1:50 pm by rtruman
Appeals Court, 2-1, Boots Rahm Emanuel Off Chicago Mayoral Ballot :: Maksym v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:27 am by Nathan Koppel
An Illinois appeals court ruled today that former White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel can't appear on the mayoral ballot because he didn't live in Chicago in the year before the election. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 10:38 am by Eugene Volokh
(I’m not surprised, though, by the involvement; Mayer is headquartered in Chicago, and generally gets involved in lots of the juicy high-profile cases, both there and elsewhere.) [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 10:36 am by Elie Mystal
Forde is not.I cannot wait for what almost has to be Saturday Night Live’s cold open this week that will no doubt involve Andy Samberg reenacting today’s events.Rahm Emanuel booted off ballot in 2-1 Appellate Court decision [Chicago Sun-Times] Emanuel booted off Chicago mayoral ballot [Politico] [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 10:36 am
The Chicago Tribune has a news update headlined "Court: Emanuel should be removed from mayoral ballot. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 10:22 am by Adrian M. Baron
It has now been reported that former White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel has been deemed ineligible to run for mayor of Chicago. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 10:21 am by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
You can read the 2-1 opinion at this link .I expect an appeal to the state Supreme Court, especially when the dissenting judge says that the majority opinion is based on on established law but the "whims" of two judges.... [read post]