Search for: "Mrs. Occupant" Results 1521 - 1540 of 2,618
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2011, 3:56 pm by NL
We are very concerned that a proper debate over the value and effect of the new proposals to further criminalise occupation of buildings is threatened by widespread distortions of the current law. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:59 am by Giles Peaker
The Claimant (Mr C) is a refugee from Iran. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 3:56 pm by NL
We are very concerned that a proper debate over the value and effect of the new proposals to further criminalise occupation of buildings is threatened by widespread distortions of the current law. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 7:23 am by admin
  Property rights have become squatters’ occupancy rights, traded in exactly the same way:   Mr. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm by SJM
Rousk v Sweden [2013] ECHR 746 (25/7/13) Mr R was the director of a company who, between 2002 and 2003, ran up income tax debts in the region of 27000 EUR. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm by SJM
Furthermore, it is also interesting that lengthy periods of unchallenged occupation are likely to be relevant when a Court considers proportionality under Article 8.Rousk v Sweden [2013] ECHR 746 (25/7/13)Mr R was the director of a company who, between 2002 and 2003, ran up income tax debts in the region of 27000 EUR. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm by SJM
Furthermore, it is also interesting that lengthy periods of unchallenged occupation are likely to be relevant when a Court considers proportionality under Article 8.Rousk v Sweden [2013] ECHR 746 (25/7/13)Mr R was the director of a company who, between 2002 and 2003, ran up income tax debts in the region of 27000 EUR. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 am by Mandelman
It is my understanding that FHA will allow an occupant-borrower to strengthen his loan application by bringing in non-occupant co-buyers but that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will not. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 11:37 pm
Rather, given his prior occupancy in the vehicle, his intent to return to same and his arguably vehicle-oriented activity in opening and shutting the truck bays and loading and unloading same at the time of his accident, operations which by their very nature could be deemed intrinsic to the operation of a delivery truck, the court finds that questions of fact exist with respect to plaintiff's so-called "occupant" status which constrains the court from granting… [read post]