Search for: "New York v. New Jersey"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 3,103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2013, 9:26 am
York County Prison, 2013 U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:04 pm
Murphy involves New Jersey and New York’s Waterfront Commission Compact. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 12:31 am
In the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, purchasing sponsored links has been found not to be Lanham Act use. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 3:22 pm
Kozel’s true beneficial ownership of the New York City condo. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:05 am
New York State Department of Correctional Services, 2009 U.S. [read post]
15 May 2011, 12:04 am
Supreme Court issued its judgment in Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:55 am
As an example, let’s say a food distribution company in New Jersey normally delivers products to New York. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:56 am
(Kluwer Patent Blog) Gabitril (Tiagabine) – US: Cephalon files suits against Sun Pharma. in New Jersey and Michigan in response to Para IV certification (Patent Docs) Glivec (Imatinib) – India: Novartis Glivec patent case: preliminary objection (Spicy IP) Lovenox (Enoxaparin) – US: Momenta files patent infringement complaint against Amphastar in response to impending launch of generic Lovenox (Patent Docs) Lumigan (Bimatoprost) – US: Validity of Allergan… [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:12 pm
Professor Verkuil was a visiting professor at the University of Pennsylvania and served as Special Master in the case of New Jersey v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
See Maia v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:43 pm
We also represent victimized investors throughout the rest of New York State, including Buffalo, Binghamton, Syracuse, Watertown, Utica, Kingston, New York City/Manhattan, Long Island, and everywhere in between, as well as in the surrounding states of Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut and New Jersey. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Highlights this week included: Sensipar (Cinacalcet) – US: District Court Delaware: Obviousness type double patenting does not require later-issued patent with shorter term to abridge term of earlier-granted patent with longer term: Brigham and Women’s Hospital et al v Teva et al (Docket Report) (PatLit) Tarka (Trandolapril / Verapamil) – US: District Court New Jersey: Sanofi, Abbott win trial over Glenmark’s generic Tarka (GenericsWeb) (IPBiz)… [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 12:08 pm
Matter of Confreda v New York State Comptroller7. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:44 am
The knowledgeable and skilled employment lawyers at the Resnick Law Group advocate for the rights of workers who have experienced discrimination and other unlawful employment practices in New Jersey and New York. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
New York also has one of the highest state cigarette taxes ($4.35 per pack), not counting the additional local New York City cigarette tax ($1.50 per pack). [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 6:21 am
Except when the woman happens to be the Attorney General of the State of New Jersey.From the New York Times article, Anne M. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 12:03 pm
By way of example, we would expect to see the same result under New York law with respect to liquor licenses, which – unlike in New Jersey and certain other states – are non-transferable licenses and thus not estate property under Bankruptcy Code Section 541 and state law. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 12:03 pm
By way of example, we would expect to see the same result under New York law with respect to liquor licenses, which – unlike in New Jersey and certain other states – are non-transferable licenses and thus not estate property under Bankruptcy Code Section 541 and state law. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 12:03 pm
By way of example, we would expect to see the same result under New York law with respect to liquor licenses, which – unlike in New Jersey and certain other states – are non-transferable licenses and thus not estate property under Bankruptcy Code Section 541 and state law. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
United States, a fraud prosecution stemming from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey, arguing that “[i]f the Court chooses to apply the logic of Department of Commerce v. [read post]
