Search for: "P Plaintiff"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 13,770
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2021, 11:21 am
Mansion runs a club where nude or semi-nude women offer entertainment; “[p]romotions containing Plaintiffs’ images were without Plaintiffs’ permission posted to Mansion’s social media pages. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 9:18 am
In Unelko, the plaintiffs sued Andy Rooney, arguing that his assertion on 60 Minutes that the plaintiffs' product "didn't work" was a defamatory statement of fact. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 3:00 am
P. 50 (2020); Packet Intel. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 6:30 pm
Pfander helpfully divides uncontested proceedings into two camps (e.g., p. 48). [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:05 am
Indianapolis, Indiana – The Plaintiff, Van Ausdall & Farrar, Inc. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 8:20 am
Simon and Magistrate Judge Joshua P. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 10:33 am
However, in a market where approximately ninety percent of S&P 500 companies already report climate risks in the public forum, requiring such disclosures as filings needlessly exposes companies to liability. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
The book then uses this distinction to set a clear way forward: courts should “focus on whether the plaintiff has a litigable interest, rather than an injury in fact” (p. 175). [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Whether a court engages with copyright limitations in the decision appears to make a big difference about who wins the case. 60% invoke some limitation; P wins 2/3 of the time when court doesn’t mention limitations; D wins 2/3 of the time when court does do so. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 9:52 am
(Stevens, supra, 49 Cal.App.4th at p. 1161.) [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 7:39 am
The case was assigned to Judge Philip P. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 4:04 am
To the extent Judge P. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 2:49 pm
Della Pelle & Richard P. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 8:55 am
Dyment, para. 22) Implicitly, the Ontario Court of Appeal also seems to be ready to accept, where appropriate, the tort of “[p]ublic disclosure of embarrassing private facts about the plaintiff” (Jones v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 6:52 am
P. 6(e), Exemption 5 (attorney work-product), and Exemption 7(C), but it did not carry its burden regarding withheld orders reflecting the commencement, termination, and extensions of the grand jury. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 8:17 am
Simon and Magistrate Judge Joshua P. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 6:54 am
² Although the plaintiff has clearly won this round the case is not over. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 10:47 am
Young and Magistrate Judge Matthew P. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 8:29 am
By Memorandum Order entered by the Honorable Leonard P. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
“Veni, vidi, vici”: Julius Caesar, 47 BC The more than ten-year-old effort by Access Copyright (“AC”) to impose a “mandatory tariff” through the Copyright Board on Canadian educational institutions is over in a quick, decisive, and devastating unanimous judgment from Justice Rosalie Abellaof the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”). 85 years of legislative policy and SCC jurisprudence are re-affirmed, vindicated, and continued. [read post]
