Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 6,181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2019, 2:28 pm
In Lam v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 1:01 pm
In that regard, he states in para. [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:55 pm
Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New… [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 3:14 am
Subramanium v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:25 am
”[9] And yet, it’s not clear whether that is as true today as it once was. [1] 146 U.S. 387 (1892). [2] 156 Wis. 261, 145 N.W. 816, 820 (1914). [3] 2011 WI 54, ¶;¶ 3-5, 335 Wis. 2d 47, 799 N.W.2d 73. [4] Muench v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 4:21 pm
But while browsing through, a few paras caught my eye. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 6:08 am
” (para. 118). [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 9:56 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm
The majority of the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada Post Corp. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 11:13 am
The per curiam opinion in Mozilla v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:08 am
State v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:38 am
Pitkow v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
The test has altered little since the 19th century, when in the 1885 case of Durham v Durham, it was stated: the contract of marriage is a very simple one, which does not require a high degree of intelligence to comprehend. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 1:38 am
¶ 22.) [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 5:55 pm
Zuschek won in State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 5:30 am
Hemisphere Assocs. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
For example, the Supreme Court had held that an LPA is maintainable against a judgment given by a single judge under: (a) s. 76(1) of the Trademarks Act, 1940 (National Sewing Thread Co v James Chadwick—a three-judge Bench); (b) s. 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (Vinita Khanolkar v Pai—a two-judge Bench); (c) s. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Sharda Devi v State of Bihar—a three-judge Bench); (d) s. 299 of the Indian Succession Act,… [read post]
