Search for: "People v David S."
Results 1521 - 1540
of 5,856
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2019, 4:27 pm
Ct., Bronx Cty., Part 92) (Justice Troy Webber); People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:11 pm
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes noted in Biddle v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
David Molnik, Director of the Administrative Hearings Unit of the Justice Center, adopted the Administrative Law Judge's findings and recommended decision and denied the petitioner's request to amend and seal the substantiated report (see 14 NYCRR 700.13[a]). [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
& Hof S. van der (2018), Consent and Privacy. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019).David Pozen’s post suggests that what I call “the Constitution of settlement” is in fact potentially less truly “settled” than it may seem to be. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 6:50 am
Female councils then allocated the goods, explains [David Graeber, an anthropology professor at the London School of Economics]. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
See, e.g., Frankfurter's opinions first in Gobitis and then his angry and anguished dissent in Barnette that helped to establish the split within liberalism between those who believed in "judicial restraint" and those who were beginning to rally around what came to be called "Footnote 4" liberalism instantiated in such decisions as Brown and then, perhaps most strikingly, Baker v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
They have done so in Fort Bend County v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
This Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:31 pm
Despite the controversy around these practices, it has never been discussed at the Supreme Court of Canada, until their recent decision in R. v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:57 am
In Rubinstein v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:00 am
David Coar. [read post]
27 May 2019, 10:16 am
What most people don't understand is it's against our Heavenly Father's law. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:10 am
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Vikram David Amar discusses the court’s approach to precedent in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Last week’s 5-4 ruling by the Supreme Court in Franchise Tax Board v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
” It was important for the House to enhance the judiciary committee’s subpoena powers in 1974 and 1998 because of the state of the chamber’s rules at the time. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Many people who believe women should have a right to terminate a pregnancy identify as “pro-life. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
In the case of Raynor v Murray ([2019] NSWDC 189) Gibson DCJ awarded the plaintiff damages of $120,000 for the publication of a defamatory email to 17 people in a building where the parties resided. [read post]
17 May 2019, 2:49 pm
,Exxon Corp. v. [read post]
