Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2010, 7:28 am
If the details of such allegations are made public, they are capable of causing a great deal of harm to the individual concerned, since many people are inclined to assume that there is “no smoke without fire”. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
It has already been held that he is unable to bring any claim to test the lawfulness of his detention under the HRA (R (on the application of Al Jedda ) v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 58), although, following the dismissal of that claim by the House of Lords, Mr Al Jedda made an application to the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 2:43 am
In Abdullah Ahmadi v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd Rothman J ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff US$7,500 damages in respect of an allegation that he was a people smuggler. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 9:32 am
It applied the principles laid down by the House of Lords in the case of Tomlinson v Congleton DC [2004] AC 46 in interpreting the 1957 Act. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 10:46 pm
The claim made by all these people is good. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:30 am
Homosexuals are as much entitled to freedom of association with others of the same sexual orientation, and to freedom of self-expression in matters that affect their sexuality, as people who are straight [paras [11] and [14] per Lord Hope and para [78] per Lord Rodger]. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:47 am
[A]re these people lazy? [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:30 am
[A]re these people lazy? [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm
The list of those down to speak is, Baron McIntosh, Lords Bach, Pannick and Willis, Baroness Bonham-Carter, Lord Borrie, Baroness Buscombe, Lords Fowler and Goodhart, Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town, Lord Hunt of Wirral, Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws, Lord Lester, Lord McNally, Lord Ramsbotham, Lord Taverne, Lord Thomas of Gresford, Lord Triesman and Baroness Young of Hornsey. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:27 pm
Reprieve immediately requested the decision be reversed, citing the US Supreme Court’s ongoing consideration of a related case, Kiyemba v Obama (Kiyemba II), in which it was decided that US courts could not prevent the Obama Administration from forcibly repatriating prisoners to countries where they face persecution. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
Both Husband and Dixon had found that, given Harrow LBC v Qazi [2004] 1 AC, unless the House of Lords/Supreme Court took a different view, the rule in Monk was not arguably incompatible with Article 8. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
Both Husband and Dixon had found that, given Harrow LBC v Qazi [2004] 1 AC, unless the House of Lords/Supreme Court took a different view, the rule in Monk was not arguably incompatible with Article 8. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:48 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 JUDGMENT The Supreme Court allowed the appeal on the jurisdiction issue (Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr dissenting) and unanimously dismissed the appeal on the inquest issue. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:15 pm
Minister of National Revenue, [1975] 2 S.C.R. 248 at 254: Lord Guest in Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:13 am
This was characterised by Lord Pannick in House of Lords debate as the bringing of proceedings ‘by people who have no connection to t [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:32 am
Like the UK court in Corbett v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:26 pm
People held in prisons are one thing. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:38 pm
Chandler v. [read post]
