Search for: "People v. Sample" Results 1521 - 1540 of 1,949
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2009, 7:00 am
Sampling will not be permitted. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 9:03 pm by Cary Coglianese
Consider a sampling of comments from his Twitter account: “These horrible & politically charged decisions coming out of the Supreme Court are shotgun blasts into the face of people that are proud to call themselves Republicans or Conservatives. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:04 pm by Michael Froomkin
Some people think that too many people are on vacation in August. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In an early case, Willingham v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 2:33 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Why can't lay people figure out a patent's quality or value? [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am by The Legal Blog
On this point, the Supreme Court, in the case of Goutam Kundu (supra) observed,"The position which emerges on reference to these authoritative texts is that depending on the type of litigation, samples of blood, when subjected to skilled scientific examination, can sometimes supply helpful evidence on various issues, to exclude a particular parentage set up in the case. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge),  (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm by Stuart Taylor
And, of course, the new decision makes a dead letter of the Court’s caveat in its 2003 Grutter v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The first case study is an analysis of various lawyers’ and law firms’ blogs about the 2014 Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]