Search for: "Quick v. United States"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 2,102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2015, 8:32 am
That was until 1977, when the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bates v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
For example, in Nichols v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
He noted that though the business community (along with NGOs and local governments) were excluded from the Paris negotiation these GHG programs might prove a good means creating robust governance beyond the state but in conjunction with states. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:11 am
It’s a far cry from Hines v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:47 am
Scheindlin, a judge in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, issued a number of innovative opinions in the case of Zubulake v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm
United States Melania Trump has attended a hearing in her libel case against a Maryland blogger apparently to show how serious she is about the case. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm
A quick look back at that case helps map out the possibilities for thinking about how to deal with racial discrimination today. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 6:56 am
Hill v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 8:29 am
The AFP v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 8:01 am
Many state owned enterprises do not see other SOEs or even the Chinese government itself as separate competitors. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 5:00 pm
California, a 1927 decision upholding the right of a Communist to advocate overthrow of the United States government. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:41 am
Business divorce has a way of drawing quick and often lopsided battle lines. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 12:39 pm
If you apply some quick arithmetic, 1200 / 50 states = 24 injured women per state. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 6:05 am
This is a mess of CLS Bank v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 1:43 pm
But now he and his publisher are going to rely on United States law to do for them exactly what he refused to do for the United States. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:00 am
SEC v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: European Court of Justice raises bar for famous brand owners wishing to prove dilution: Intel Corporation v CPM United Kingdom (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPKat) (IPKat) (Class 46) RPX Corporation – Defensive patent aggregation club (Securing Innovation) (Patent Fools) (Patent Prospector) (Techdirt) (IAM)… [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am
Do not expect all lawyers to agree, and many will be quick to write. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:22 pm
In addition, United States v. [read post]
