Search for: "SELLERS v. STATE"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 3,683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2022, 4:46 pm
” Brava I.P., Boor, and Edson also warranted that the “Patents, Know-How and/or Intellectual Property Rights constitute all of the intellectual property used in or necessary to conduct the business of manufacturing and selling plastic roofing shingles as conducted and as currently planned to be conducted by Seller or any other entity owned and/or controlled by Seller. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 2:15 am
Appellate History In 2004, Mr Durkin sought relief in the Aberdeen Sheriff Court against DSG and HFC stating that he had validly rescinded the contract of sale and credit agreement. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
Nicola tells all.* Can the State automatically acquire ownership of your copyright? [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:31 pm
Writing for the Court, Justice Thomas explained that the holding of United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:13 am
City of New York RICHMOND COUNTYContractsMere Shipment of Goods by eBay Seller to New York Did Not Qualify as Sole Basis for Personal Jurisdiction Sayeedi v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 11:27 am
Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla. 1966); Sunshine State Insurance Company V. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 12:27 pm
Cooperativa v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:10 pm
But perhaps not so absurd given the deteriorated mental state of the person making the comment.Now, in the end, I still think that Justice Humes is right. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm
See Cassel v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 10:52 am
In Coy v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
(See Melone v. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 5:10 pm
The regulations stated as follows, "Before the completion of any wholesale distribution by a wholesale distributor of a prescription drug for which the seller is not an authorized distributor of record to another wholesale distributor or retail pharmacy, the seller shall provide to the purchaser a statement identifying each prior sale, purchase or trade of such drug. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am
The Supreme Court’s determination that Howard Fensterman’s conduct during the settlement of the New Franklin litigation “was simply a product of his conflict of interest in representing both buyers and sellers in the New Franklin and Fort Tyron transactions” is a premature factual finding inappropriate at this stage of the litigation (see Warney v State of New York, 16 NY3d 428, 436-437; Matter of Gerard P. v Paula P., 186 AD3d 934,… [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:20 am
Sellers, which asks when a federal court in a habeas case should “look through” a summary state-court ruling to review the last reasoned state-court decision. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 11:18 am
For example, in Squillante v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:07 pm
For example, in Squillante v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 6:00 am
The case is DeWolfe v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 1:27 pm
Drivers Headquarters, LP v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 6:41 am
For the seller t [read post]
