Search for: "STANFORD v. STATE" Results 1521 - 1540 of 2,042
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by James F. Aspell
Robert Wilson President & CEO, WorkersCompensation.com, LLC www.workerscompensation.com Blog: From Bob’s Cluttered Desk Related Articles: I Saw The Future Of Workers’ Comp Today Workers’ Comp 20/20: Tethered by Wireless – The Future Office Without Walls Become a “Tech Translator”: National Unemployment Rate for Technology Jobs Is 3.3% MYTH #5: Because FECA Is So Different From State Workers’ Compensation Systems, Private Sector Case Management… [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm by Victoria Kwan
Two decades after writing the landmark United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Chairman Schapiro further stated that the end of the program was designed “to expedite the Commission’s enforcement efforts and ensure that justice is swiftly served. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 3:17 am by Rob Robinson
Notably, Stanford scholars point out potential repercussions on complementary markets, modestly masking the AI landscape’s profound contours. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Alina Artunian
Judicial sentencing recently made national headlines after a California state judge gave a lenient six-month sentence to a Stanford student who was convicted of three felony counts of sexual assault. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 12:27 pm
  As far back as 1977, however, the Supreme Court noted in Bates v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The DfE responded to the investigation by stating it would not be appropriate to comment on individual cases. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:54 pm by Brian Shiffrin
United States, 395 U.S. 6, 33, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 1546, 23 L.Ed.2d 57;  Tot v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
Supreme Court The most significant US Supreme Court decision in this area since our last round-up is one that we trailed in January of this year, in United States v Jones (10-1259 01/23/2012). [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
  He has also taught at Stanford, Vanderbilt and American. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Transparency Project Blog has a post analysing the recent “civil partnership case”, R v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Dingemans J gave judgment in Lokhova v Tymula ([2016] EWHC 225 (QB))(heard 26 and 27 January 2016). [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
O’Brien eds., Engaging The Law in China (Stanford University Press, 2005); – Stanley B. [read post]