Search for: "STATE EX REL. v. Court of Appeals"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 2,056
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2011, 10:20 am
Wisconsin Court of Appeals CERTIFICATION CIVIL OPINIONS Open Meetings Budget Repair Bill The legality of the passage of the Budget Repair Bill is certified to the Wisconsin Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:02 am
State, ex rel., Wyo. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:17 am
Compare this case and State ex rel. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:22 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Sept. 30, 2005), perm. appeal denied, (Mar. 27, 2006). [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 4:10 am
Yesterday, in Old Reliable Wholesale, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 1:27 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:28 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:59 am
(Docket Report) False marking lawsuits are real problem for business and make little sense when applied to expired patents (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) USPTO symposium March 11 to bring together women inventors and entrepreneurs (Director’s Forum) Deciding whether to stay a case pending reexamination (Reexamination Alert) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: ABB v Cooper – The broad scope of declaratory judgment jurisdiction (Patently-O) District Court Ohio rules false… [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:08 pm
State ex rel. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:00 am
It is also the public policy of this state to prohibit persons under the influence of alcohol from driving. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm
First, unlike most other federal legal questions appealed to regional Circuit Courts of Appeal, virtually all patent law related appeals from across the country are heard by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the “Federal Circuit”). [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
X, § 3; State of Cal. ex rel. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm
As the case was pending discretionary review from the New Mexico Supreme Court, the United States Supreme Court issued its Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 2:17 am
” In People ex rel. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
One of them fell by the wayside (Manchester v Mushin), while another has been granted PTA to the Supreme Court, but has been stayed pending the outcome of these cases (Salford v Mullen - the lead case in the Court of Appeal, somewhat bizarrely as Salford weren't even represented there). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
One of them fell by the wayside (Manchester v Mushin), while another has been granted PTA to the Supreme Court, but has been stayed pending the outcome of these cases (Salford v Mullen - the lead case in the Court of Appeal, somewhat bizarrely as Salford weren't even represented there). [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 5:54 pm
In Gayet, the court told us we need to look at whether the cohabitating couple bears the "generic character of a family unit as a relatively permanent household". [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:01 pm
True value is equivalent to fair market value, which the Ohio Supreme Court in State ex rel. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
Furthermore, it’s relatively easy to write a appeal brief that points out an error in procedure. [read post]
