Search for: "STATE V. POWERS" Results 1521 - 1540 of 41,370
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2024, 3:06 am by jonathanturley
For example, Michael Waldman, president of New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice, noted that in 1974 the Court considered United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:26 pm by Ilya Somin
There have been several previous such cases, including three appellate court decisions, and Judge Ezra's own recent ruling in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:16 pm by Tom Ginsburg
The famous Brandeis brief appears around that time, in such cases as Muller v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 1:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
In March 2023, OpenAI released its most powerful language model yet, GPT-4…. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Georgia Stewart, Tumelo, on Tuesday, February 27, 2024 Tags: ESG, ExxonMobil, Proxy voting, shareholder engagement, Shareholder power 2024 Proxy Season Preview: Looking for a Silver Lining Posted by Merel Spierings, The Conference Board, on Tuesday, February 27, 2024 Tags: Compensation committees, disclosures, pass-through voting, Proxy season, Say on pay, Shareholder proposals Tornetta v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Georgia Stewart, Tumelo, on Tuesday, February 27, 2024 Tags: ESG, ExxonMobil, Proxy voting, shareholder engagement, Shareholder power 2024 Proxy Season Preview: Looking for a Silver Lining Posted by Merel Spierings, The Conference Board, on Tuesday, February 27, 2024 Tags: Compensation committees, disclosures, pass-through voting, Proxy season, Say on pay, Shareholder proposals Tornetta v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
:  Emergency Powers in the Time of COVID (2023). 53. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:25 pm by Orin S. Kerr
In light of that exchange, I thought I might point out that today, in United States v. [read post]
The trial (Liberty v SSHD)  is expected to run for two days at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 10:32 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
 What's the upshot for Section Three and Trump v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Rachel Kleinfeld
Supreme Court had taken on new powers (in their case, the power of constitutional review) in the 1803 case, Marbury v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am by lawbod
It no longer needs to participate in standard democratic argument and discussion, rather it has exported its power. [read post]