Search for: "STATE v BUSH" Results 1521 - 1540 of 4,538
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2015, 6:14 am by Jim Sedor
Before he ever took his first law class, he served as his own lawyer, filing the original complaint in what is now called Shapiro v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:50 am by Amy Howe
” Justice Stephen Breyer appeared on French public radio to discuss (in French) his new book; he also discussed (among other things) Bush v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:10 am by Milena Sterio
  In light of the 2004 Supreme Court opinion in Sosa v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:12 pm by Joseph Fishkin
 They assumed that the meaning of the Commerce Clause in NFIB v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 10:36 am
Bush was in his first term as president (under $2 in New Jersey). [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Based on the quoted language, however, it appears to be the 2001 holding in Ohio v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Hogan (invalidating same-sex admissions policy), considered her vote in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 9:51 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
July 23, 2015, By Jeff Plungis, Bloomberg.com More Blog Entries: Dakter v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
 But the Supreme Court proved hesitant to repudiate Bollman’s dangerously flaccid view of the writ, notwithstanding that history and policy alike called upon it to take that step.Finally, in 2008 in Boumediene v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:36 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
” Serving as Solicitor General of the United States; resolving conflicts among departments about and developing the legal position of the United States; contrasting the Solicitor General’s office and the Office of Legal Counsel; engaging the president to decide the legal position of the United States; being a legal advisor in the White House; the value of political service to the independence of legal opinions, why winning Bush v. [read post]