Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S."
Results 1521 - 1540
of 6,065
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
GOV'T CODE § 22.225(b)(3), (c). [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 2:42 am
C. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
R & S Pilling t/as Phoenix Engineering v UK Insurance Ltd, heard 13 Dec 2018. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:55 pm
” The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued a decision, Orthofix, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:04 pm
LeadClick, Marshall’s Locksmith v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
Henson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 1:11 pm
As a reminder, the following italicized questions come from Jane C. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 10:02 am
For consistency’s sake, Senator Hagan would expect that, apart from the U.S. marketing restrictions, these provisions will be applied by the regulators in conformity with and incorporating the Federal Reserve’s current precedents, rulings, positions, and practices under Sections 4(c)(9) and 4(c)(13) of the Bank Holding Company Act so as to provide greater certainty and utilize the established legal framework for funds operated by bank holding companies… [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 11:16 am
He quoted the Court of Justice of the European Union’s judgment in Blomqvist v Rolex C-98/13 [EU: C: 2014:55] and stated that this ruling is clear authority for the proposition that “the sale of goods under a sign by a foreign website to a consumer in the United Kingdom or the European Union constitutes use of the sign in the relevant territory, and that this is so even if there is no antecedent listing, offer for sale or adverts… [read post]
4 May 2018, 6:50 am
Knox v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:03 am
Wayfair, in which they will decide whether to overrule an earlier decision holding that the Constitution bars a state from requiring catalog retailers to collect sales taxes on sales made to state residents unless the retailer is “physically present” in the state. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 7:29 am
Vital Proteins LLC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 1:20 pm
C. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
", considers the interaction between the specific jurisdictional rules regarding claims involving EU unitary IP rights and the jurisdictional rules under the Brussels regulation in light of the CJEU decisions in case C-617/15 (Hummel v Nike) and joined Cases C-24/16 and C-25/16 (Nintendo v BigBen Interactive) and the subsequent English court’s decision in Poul Chang Metal Industry Company Ltd v Bailcast Ltd and Anor.Book… [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 2:16 am
Never too late 24 [week ending Sunday 14 December] -- ** INTA’s When Trademarks Overlap With Other IP Rights Special ** | Scottish Law Society misinforms about UPC in Scotland | EPO Enlarged BoA Members’ letter against against President Battistelli’s BoA Member’s house ban | German lititgator writes German delegate to EPO AC | EU Judges join the chorus of condemnation against President Battistelli | EPO replies to multilarelal… [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:10 pm
By Eric Goldman Johnson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:55 pm
” The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued a decision, Orthofix, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:20 am
The disputed domain name in C Brewer and Sons Limited v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 9:05 am
As readers will remember, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)’s ruling in Case C-128/11 Oracle v UsedSoft [on which see Eleonora’s first historical post as a guest Kat here]established that, under certain circumstances, exhaustion of the distribution right within Article 4(2) of the Software Directive may take place for both software copies incorporated in physical media (like a CD or DVD) and digital files… [read post]
