Search for: "Shields v. State" Results 1521 - 1540 of 5,102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2019, 2:00 pm by Doug Cornelius
Title V creates a whole new disclosure regime for private funds. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The Tenth Circuit has not yet ruled on whether such a First Amendment right of access exists in civil cases, see United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am by Andrei Gribakov
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
They also wanted Fischbarg to apply for sale-of-liquor licenses from the New York State Liquor Authority (“the SLA”). [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
They also wanted Fischbarg to apply for sale-of-liquor licenses from the New York State Liquor Authority (“the SLA”). [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
They also wanted Fischbarg to apply for sale-of-liquor licenses from the New York State Liquor Authority (“the SLA”). [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
They also wanted Fischbarg to apply for sale-of-liquor licenses from the New York State Liquor Authority (“the SLA”). [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
At Modern Democracy, Michael Parsons elaborates on the implications of Rucho v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
New York would seem to establish a point on a spectrum of deference to agencies’ stated rationales, opposite that of Hawaii v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:35 pm by John Floyd
  Police Seize Property and Threaten Unsubstantiated Charges   In a March 2017 ruling in Leonard v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:54 am by Steve Minor
State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:18 am by Burton A. Padove
Ultimately, the court ruled, provisions of the Indiana Tort Claims Act shielded the government from civil liability. [read post]