Search for: "Shields v. United States" Results 1521 - 1540 of 2,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2012, 2:30 am
This was many years before the United States Supreme Court would decide to outlaw school segregation in Brown v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
" Consequently, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a "felony drug offense," even if state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:49 am by Bruce E. Boyden
The principal objection I have to such orders is that they violate the fundamental understanding of how civil discovery in the United States is supposed to work. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 9:05 pm by Katherine McKeen
In the 1980s, faith groups in the Southwestern United States organized to aid refugees fleeing from violence in Central America. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
This is because every state’s right of publicity law incorporates some sort of defense to protect First Amendment interests,[8] and “recogniz[es] that the right of publicity cannot shield public figures from criticism. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 1:19 pm by JURIST Staff
These rulings established that the right to life includes the right to a healthy environment, placing a duty on the state to shield its citizens from environmental hazards. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 8:18 am by Scott Pringle
  Most ERISA plans in the United States include a discretionary clause if the applicable law permits the clause’s inclusion. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 11:04 am
” This was the decidedly two-sided shape of the hearing on United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:41 am by Jamison Koehler
United States, 618 A.2d 688 (D.C. 1992), the complaining witness was standing outside a liquor using a pay telephone when the defendant and a number of other people drove up. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:43 pm by Ted Folkman
The government disposes of McIntyre’s claims by pointing out that he is an alien who lives outside the United States and that he therefore has no First Amendment rights, citing Kleindienst v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 2:36 pm by Maxwell Kennerly
The Plaintiffs argue that because Ciavarella’s acts contravened the Constitution of the United States, he was acting in the “clear absence of jurisdiction” and therefore is not immune from suit. [read post]