Search for: "Small v. People" Results 1521 - 1540 of 8,510
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2021, 7:06 pm
And yet there is ultimately a thoughtlessness here: what may be possible against a small and struggling state (and even that is not clear) may actually backfire when used against a state whose own power and cultural self-confidence as great as that of Europe. [read post]
6 May 2021, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
The CDC says that fully vaccinated people can "[v]isit with other fully vaccinated people indoors without wearing masks or physical distancing. [read post]
5 May 2021, 12:11 pm by Evelyn Douek
Any definitive decision would have made lots of people very unhappy. [read post]
3 May 2021, 3:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
Unsurprisingly, after class last Fall, a student at Rutgers Law School in New Jersey asked a professor about one of those 10,000+ cases—State v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 7:19 am by Florian Mueller
Generally, "small but significant" means 5%-10%, and plaintiffs often argue that they can establish even greater market power than what it takes to command a 10% increase.Epic's examples all make sense. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Ludmer In Law Society of Upper Canada v Brian Allan Ludmer, 2012 ONLSHP 191 and Law Society of Upper Canada v Brian Allan Ludmer, 2013 ONLSHP 114, Mr. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 6:04 am by Eleonora Rosati
As IPKat readers will know, a few weeks ago the US Supreme Court delivered its much-awaited judgment in Google v Oracle. [read post]