Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 1521 - 1540 of 12,650
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2014, 6:25 am by Jon Ibanez
However, the United States Supreme Court in the case of Leocal v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:04 am by Tom Kosakowski
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California has unveiled an Ombudsperson Program for attorneys to raise issues about the Court or individual judges. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 12:20 pm by Jason Ostendorf
Massey in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, case number 3:23-cv-02323-MMA-AHG. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:06 am by Max Kohn
On June 16, the Supreme Court issued an 8-1 ruling in United States, ex rel. [read post]
In 2003, California lawmakers enacted Labor Code Section 1102.6, setting forth a framework for whistleblower retaliation claims that varied from the burden-shifting test established by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 9:43 am
  Legal ethics speclialists may recall Standing Committee on Discipline in the United States District Court for the Central District of California v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:32 pm
Although the specific question raised in Building Industry Association of Central California v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:47 am by Jeff Welty
It now includes a discussion of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Navarette v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 11:48 am by Andrew Livingston
United Airlines, Inc., the Court is set to address whether Labor Code § 226, which governs wage statement requirements, applies to wage statements provided by an out-of-state employer to an employee who resides in California, receives pay in California, and pays California income tax on wages, but who does not principally work in California or in any other state. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 5:30 am by Andrei Gribakov
But could a single state secure a GDPR adequacy determination even though the United States has not obtained a full adequacy decision? [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
Because we focus here on the cy près distribution of unclaimed settlement proceeds, we note only that following a 1999 federal court trial of state and federal antitrust actions, the district court found against Microsoft, see United States v. [read post]