Search for: "State v Cooper"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 8,564
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2021, 11:11 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:45 am
” United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 12:30 pm
And, although rational basis applies, it's not the "sub-rational basis" that a case last year implied is called for during a pandemic under Jacobson v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:23 am
Attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a Motion in Limine in the case of United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:23 am
Attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a Motion in Limine in the case of United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 8:01 am
How and to what extent, if any, was theCapitol siege connected to earlier threats and plots against the governor of Michigan and state and local election officials in other states? [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:31 am
It was also discussed in the judgments C-507/17, Google v CNIL; and Case C-136/17 that a data subject should have a “right to be forgotten” where the retention of such data infringes the Directive 95/46 and the GDPR. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 8:01 am
The United States has made a commitment — by law and by treaty — to protect people who come to this country fleeing persecution. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
The following day, the Washington Post ran a story alleging that under Pack’s leadership the USAGM has refused to cooperate with Biden’s transition team. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:31 pm
Penn State Law Research Paper No. 06-2020). [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
They also cite Sosa v. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 11:30 am
The answer, in my view, is “no,” based largely on Rwanda’s State interference with the ICTR. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 7:31 am
It also argued that its termination of Tenpenny was justified because she did not cooperate with the investigation. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 3:26 pm
Balderas v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 11:21 pm
Ct. at 2372-2373 ("[W]e cannot construe a criminal statute on the assumption that the Government will 'use it responsibly.'" (quoting United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm
(Please note that these filing figures represent federal court filings only; the figures do not include separate state court class action lawsuit filings.) [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:49 am
Senior judges have repeatedly noted the excesses of the Spiliada regime, in terms of the time, expense and judicial resource spent in litigating questions about the appropriate forum (see, most recently, Lord Briggs in Vedanta Resources Plc v Lungowe [2019] UKSC 20, [6]-[14]), yet they and the rule makers have done little or nothing about it. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 8:49 pm
The Vice-Chair stated the importance of the issues, 35. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 2:40 pm
” Choin v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
See Harmelin v. [read post]
