Search for: "State v. Childs" Results 1521 - 1540 of 19,027
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2019, 7:40 pm by Seeger Weiss LLP
By 5 p.m. that day, 427 Child Victims Act lawsuits were electronically filed statewide, with 169 filed in New York City alone, according to the New York State Unified Court System. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 11:55 am by Georgialee Lang
It is not often that the United States Supreme Court intervenes in a custody case, but this month the Supremes heard arguments in the case of Chafin v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
This case is a recent analysis and application of the NJ domestic violence laws, current case law across the state, combined with the entire gamut of family court litigation, including child custody, visitation schedules, support, and divorce. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
This case is a recent analysis and application of the NJ domestic violence laws, current case law across the state, combined with the entire gamut of family court litigation, including child custody, visitation schedules, support, and divorce. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:09 am by Charon QC
While Orchards v Lee may place a hurdle in the way of suing the child, Palmer v Cornwall County Council confirms that an adult or other legal entity can always pick up the bill if the facts fall within current law on negligence. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:44 pm by EPLawyer
While researching what expenses should be considered when calculating child support, I ran across this case:Jackson v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 7:51 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
In our next installment, we will study the statements made to Grandmother and how the attorney can get these statements admitted into evidence, as well as the case of State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 12:41 pm
The problem in Laura Ww. v Peter Ww was that the husband never signed the consent. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 5:25 am
She stated: "Defendant should not be heard now to rely on a presumption that she should have asserted in the divorce court. [read post]