Search for: "State v. Collins" Results 1521 - 1540 of 2,356
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2011, 9:50 am by Kathryn Noble, Olswang
  And thus Mr Coke-Wallis can continue to be a member of the Institute (“unfortunate” and “absurd” though this might be, in Lord Collins’ words): readers may feel that he is a lucky man. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:46 am by Moseley Collins
THE SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR FRAUD IS PROPERLY STATED AGAINST THE DEMURRING PARTIES EVEN THOUGH THE CAUSE OF ACTION DOES NOT ALLEGE THE PLAINTIFFS' RELIANCE ON THEIR FALSE PROMISES AND REPRESENTATIONS The controlling case is Randi W. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Blog Editorial
On Tuesday 29 and Wednesday 30 March 2011, Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Collins and Clarke will hear NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:53 am by GuestPost
In R (on the application of Negassi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 386 (Admin) Collins J. considered the case for damages for breach of Article 8 arising out of the Supreme Court decision that the prohibition on subsequent asylum seekers working was unlawful in the context of the Reception Directive. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:18 am by Saf Hussain
The appeal to the Supreme Court is due to be heard by Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Collins and Lord Clarke. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Google v Louis Vuitton C-236/08 which considered the degree of ‘neutrality’ on the part of an intermediary. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Blog Editorial
On Wednesday 23 and Thursday 24 March, Bloomsbury International Limited and others v Sea Fish Industry Authority and Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs will be heard by Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, Lords Mance and Collins. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:49 am by WSLL
DiBenedetto of Metier Law Firm, LLC, Fort Collins, ColoradoRepresenting Appellee (Appellees): Kate M. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
 It is also the public policy of this state to prohibit persons under the influence of alcohol from driving. [read post]