Search for: "State v. High"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 32,074
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2008, 9:49 am
See Medellin v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 2:52 am
Article 27 of the Jurisdiction Regulation, which requires that any Member State court other than the Member State court first seised of an action ought to decline jurisdiction to hear a dispute, did not apply in circumstances where the first seised court was located in a non-EU state. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 1:47 am
A single judge of the Calcutta High Court held in Gemini Silk Limited v. [read post]
Texas’ Recognition of an Out-of-State Divorce Decree: A Look into the Court of Appeals’ Approach
17 Jan 2014, 10:35 am
” Ammann v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:50 am
There are many state court decisions adjudicating the state constitutionality of the marriage exclusion; it is high time the federal courts debated the issue openly, and that federal court debate ought not be foreshortened by the Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 2:56 am
In a January 2025 judgment the High Court offers a stark reminder of the ethical obligations that underpin legal practice when placing information before a court. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 7:39 am
First, does United States v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 3:05 pm
Under the overruled decision, _S.F. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:20 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:42 pm
(Read the high court’s opinion in Brown v. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 4:09 pm
In Antony & anr v Sivakumar, Richard Spearman QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, delivered an ex tempore judgment in which he ordered the defendant to pay both claimants £15,000 in damages. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 10:16 am
–State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:23 pm
In the Court’s view, being a part of the security forces of the State, the police should display a particularly high degree of tolerance to offensive speech, unless such inflammatory speech is likely to provoke imminent unlawful actions in respect of their personnel and to expose them to a real risk of physical violence. [read post]
3 May 2012, 12:52 pm
In Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hellicar [2012] HCA 17 and appeals relating to 6 other non-executive directors of James Hardie Industries Ltd (“JHIL”) the High Court allowed ASIC’s appeals and held that each director breached his or her duties as a director of the company by approving the company’s release of a misleading announcement to the Australian Stock Exchange (“ASX”). [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:13 pm
On the facts of the case, the High Court found Mr. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 12:06 pm
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Randhawa & Anor, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 2599 (22 October 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Wandsworth v Whibley [2008] EWCA Civ 1259 (14 November 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Farraj & Anor v King’s Healthcare NHS Trust & Anor [2008] EWHC 2468 (QB) (17 October 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Muscat v Health Professions Council [2008] EWHC 2798… [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 8:35 am
The Twitter v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 6:33 am
The high court ruled unanimously in Cyan Inc. et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 8:55 am
It joins New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
