Search for: "State v. Jacobs" Results 1521 - 1540 of 1,970
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2011, 12:24 pm by Robert J. Terry
Speed camera ticket tossed over typo in Md. law – by Danny Jacobs James Liskow beat his speed camera ticket literally by a letter in the law. 2. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:23 am by INFORRM
– which concerns a State-sponsored dictionary and book that contained derogatory stereotypes of Roma. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:18 am by Mandelman
  John Jacob Ehlinger is listed as president of Capital Debt Management. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:11 am
. 'Nerd' fails to gain an entry, notwithstanding the consideration of this word by Lords Justices Jacob and Pill in the patent appeal of Rockwater v Technip (here). [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" (Sinrod v Stone, 20 AD3d 560, 561 [2d Dept 2005]; Mosesson v Jacob D. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:59 am by Marie Louise
Ericsson: Let the patent games begin (China Hearsay) Europe Key music industry lawyer now EU copyright chief (ArsTechnica) (TorrentFreak) Microsoft tries whacking Google with European antitrust stick (ArsTechnica) (IPKat) France Exploit turns anti-piracy agency site into The Pirate Bay (TorrentFreak) Germany BGH – Art exhibitions in an online archive (IPKat) Greece TV site sued for linking to completely legal videos (TorrentFreak) Israel An Israel trademark decision as mad as a hatter:… [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am by Marie Louise
Murray (IP finance) United States US Patent Reform America Invents Act: First to Invent v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:55 pm by Jim Dempsey
  The language in 2703(d) is drawn from the Supreme Court case of Terry v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:50 am by Kathryn Noble, Olswang
  The Supreme Court, however, felt constricted by the operation of law: Lord Clarke stated that whilst he could see the merits of introducing a public interest exception, “whether and in what circumstances to permit such as exception seems to me to be essentially a matter for Parliament and not for the courts” (see paragraph 49). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 5:00 am by Fernando M. Pinguelo
Jacob Ahroner, the plaintiff in Ahroner v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:24 am
At paragraphs 14 to 18 Jacob LJ killed any suggestion that there was such an infringement on the facts before the court: "14. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm by INFORRM
The Respondent is represented by Mr Desmond Browne and Mr Jacob Dean. [read post]