Search for: "State v. Lee"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 4,533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
Catalina v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 6:31 am
Interestingly, the New York and Tennessee complaint highlights the plight of New York State Senator Lee Zeldin, who is the New York Republican Party’s nominee to represent the Empire State’s First Congressional District. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
" Griswold v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:23 pm
(U.S. 1940) (so are price-fixing agreements); United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Terry v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 1:16 pm
Lee 15-789Issue: (1) Whether, for federal habeas purposes, California’s procedural rule generally barring review of claims that were available but not raised on direct appeal is an “adequate” state-law ground for rejection of a claim; and (2) whether, when a federal habeas petitioner argues that a state procedural default is not an “adequate” state-law ground for rejection of a claim, the burden of persuasion as to adequacy rests on… [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:52 am
In this regard, Brousseau v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 4:27 pm
The Texas Supreme Court case, entitled Loftin v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:09 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:14 pm
The case, Doe v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Last June, the United States Supreme Court determined that blank">Crawford v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 5:36 am
Lee, decided on May 22. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 10:42 am
State Dep’t of Corr. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:47 am
Lee was the last case in which the Court itself found an agency action reasonable, and therefore lawful, under Chevron. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm
From Lee v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am
In Loughrin v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 3:15 pm
United States, 128 S. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:39 am
Wade,” Lee said. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 10:00 am
Mike Lee (R-Utah). [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 12:28 am
Historians have documented the appearance of the undue-burden test in Solicitor General Rex Lee’s 1983 amicus brief in City of Akron v. [read post]
