Search for: "State v. Long."
Results 1521 - 1540
of 51,467
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am
And don’t get me started on the Reasonably Scared Cop Rule of Graham v. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Instead, relying exclusively on the dicta of a 77-year-old lower-court precedent, SEC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 8:24 pm
The cases, Moody v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm
It’s 99% of TM law and that will only grow as long as the scheme continues to work. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
It does honor to the distinguished and long running series of which it is now an integral part. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:58 pm
In Etheridge v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:40 pm
From Judge Roger Benitez's decision in Fouts v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:11 pm
Getnick Law has a long and distinguished record holding pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, clinical testing laboratories, and medical device companies accountable under federal and State False Claims Acts. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Other scenarios: Howard University Alumni Association should be understood as NFU outside the scope of dilution, as long as it’s a truthful representation—it’s not using Howard as a mark but rather the unitary mark Howard University Alumni Association; the exclusion doesn’t, like other parts of the statute, refer to uses “comprising” the famous mark. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm
The latest is the landmark ruling by Justice Aylen of the Federal Court in Province of Alberta et al v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
New Relists McKesson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 11:13 am
In Small v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 10:41 am
In his initial ruling in 2019, (Citizens for Clean Energy v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 8:00 am
In one case, the Court made race-conscious affirmative action—which had long been only grudgingly accepted—even more difficult. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:30 am
Yet in Griswold v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
La Rose v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 3:27 pm
Last July, in Missouri v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
We discuss this alternate view on pp. 396-397 of Part III: We acknowledge that there is, and has been, a long-standing, alternate, minority view—the Impeachment Clause only requires the remedy of removal for the three expressly-listed classes of positions: "[1] The President, [2] Vice President and [3] all civil Officers of the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:01 pm
Kentucky decision.Heiskell – who started a law practice in Fort Worth in 1984 after working as an Assistant United States Attorney in Dallas – recalled how people were often surprised when they first met him; They they assumed he was white because of his German last name. [read post]
