Search for: "State v. Martin" Results 1521 - 1540 of 4,211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2016, 1:57 pm by Robert Loeb, Helen Klein Murillo
The question presented was the military commission’s jurisdiction over extraterritorial charges that had no articulable nexus to the United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 8:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In this instance, said the court, "The hazard of being injured as a result of lifting a heavy garbage bag and loading it into a sanitation truck is inherent in the work of a sanitation worker," citing Marin v San Martin Rest., 287 AD2d 441.The court ruled that City had established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence demonstrating that the injured Plaintiff"s coworker was not acting negligently or differently than a… [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 8:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In this instance, said the court, "The hazard of being injured as a result of lifting a heavy garbage bag and loading it into a sanitation truck is inherent in the work of a sanitation worker," citing Marin v San Martin Rest., 287 AD2d 441.The court ruled that City had established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence demonstrating that the injured Plaintiff"s coworker was not acting negligently or differently than a… [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 12:31 am by Stephen Page
It seems to me that is not the most desirable state of affairs. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 12:41 pm by admin
Lockheed Martin Corp., case no. 6:21-cv-1363-RBD-DCI, document 399 (M.D. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am by James Bickford
Frommert, which Martine Cicconi recapped over the weekend at this blog. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:30 am by Kent Scheidegger
Martin, but the Ninth just danced around Martin, and now the issue is back before the Supreme Court in Johnson v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 2:20 pm by admin
The wife’s argument that the debt did not fit within the ambit of 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(15) because it was owed to a third party and not directly to her former spouse was rejected by the court, citing Howard v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:18 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D.
Much has been made by progressive bloggers and commentators of the 17 energy investments owned by Judge Martin Feldman of the Federal District Court in New Orleans. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 4:30 am by Kevin Couch
The trial court granted Zamperla's motion for summary judgment, and, in Alexander v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am by Mandelman
 For example, the complaint alleges that “the challenged provisions of SB 94 as applied by the State Bar…” … unconstitutionally infringe upon the rights of Plaintiff, other members of the State Bar and citizens of California seeking legal representation under Article I, Section l0 of the United States Constitution, which states that no State shall pass any law “impairing the Obligation of Contracts. [read post]