Search for: "State v. Mitchell" Results 1521 - 1540 of 1,806
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court… [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 8:43 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Crown attempted to rely on Justice Binnie’s holding in Mitchell v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
This was cause for Nixon’s concern, and his scheme to block the peace talks from occurring.Per the notes, which I have translated and summarized, Nixon instructed Haldeman that Bryce “Harlow [should be] monitoring [the situation in] V[iet] Nam. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 10:20 am by Jeremy M. Klang
One of our business attorneys at Schober Schober & Mitchell, S.C. would be happy to help. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:58 am by Alfred Brophy
 Justice Harris' viciously proslavery opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 10:20 am by Jeremy M. Klang
One of our business attorneys at Schober Schober & Mitchell, S.C. would be happy to help. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
United States Google is expected to pay a multimillion dollar penalty from the Federal Trade Commission over its handling of kids’ information on its popular video site YouTube. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:06 am
filed 04/04/07   closed 12/10/07 1:07-cv-01891 Mitchell v. [read post]