Search for: "State v. Oxford" Results 1521 - 1540 of 1,744
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Angela Swan
His analysis of the result in LAC Minerals Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:53 am by Steve Bainbridge
Evidence as to the use of serial commas by newspapers tells us nothing about the social state thereof. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 9:28 am by Martin George
The Supreme Court of Singapore was the first to refer a question of foreign law to a foreign court (Westacre Investments Inc v The State-Owned Company Yugoimport SDPR (also known as Jugoimport-SDPR) [2009] 2 SLR (R) 166), when it sought a determination of a question of English law. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Michael Mabry stated the following in his declaration: “We havenever been contacted by Aurora nor [sic] any of its agents in person, by telephone or byfirst class mail to explore options for us to avoid foreclosure as required in CC § 2923.5. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 9:55 pm
[S]implified procedures are not yet effectively controlled in the majority of the audited Member States. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 am by @ErikJHeels
Syndicate, The (West Springfield, MA) B&V Cab, Inc. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:37 am by James Bickford
”  Blogging for The Atlantic, Stuart Taylor Jr. parses Kagan’s Oxford master’s thesis for clues into her views on Graham v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:19 am by Adam Chandler
Finally, Wendy Kaminer has a piece for the Atlantic on the federal sex offender case, United States v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:09 am by Erin Miller
Florida and United States v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am by Anna Christensen
Florida and United States v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:30 pm by Martin George
His book on International Commercial Litigation was published by Oxford University Press in February 2010. [read post]
1 May 2010, 1:43 pm by jly
In the National Journal Magazine, Jonathan Rauch discusses a new book on such socioeconomic trends in the states – Red Families v. [read post]