Search for: "State v. State" Results 1521 - 1540 of 258,362
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2010, 6:08 pm by Dwight Sullivan
The United States today filed this notice of withdrawal of its previous motion to file under seal in Martin v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 4:25 pm
Check out the excellent coverage of State Of Play V (in sunny Singapore) from Andres (of Edinburgh) and Nic (of QUT). [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:17 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF: Same v AM; Same v AN; Same v AE Court of Appeal “While as much information as possible, without imperilling national security, should be disclosed to a person subject to a control order, it was arguable that there was no irreducible minimum the nondisclosure of which would automatically make a trial unfair. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 7:32 am by Daily Record Staff
In each, the State charged Appellants with the “flagship” ... [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 5:52 am by Daily Record Staff
The State charged Linwood Smith with felony murder, armed robbery, and related charges arising out of the incident. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 7:39 am by Daily Record Staff
In each, the State charged Appellants with the “flagship” ... [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 7:30 am by Daily Record Staff
Three years later, when facing removal from the United States, ... [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:18 am by zshapiro
In one of the sections the Arizona statute made it a state misdemeanor for an unauthorized alien to seek or engage in work in the State. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:24 pm
Last Friday, we looked at AFCCA's fascinating opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:54 am by tracey
St Prix v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] EWCA Civ 806;  [2011] WLR (D)  226 “A Union citizen who, when within the United Kingdom, ceased to work in circumstances other than those set out in paragraphs (a) to (d) of article 7(3) of the Citizenship Directive was not a ‘worker’ entitled to the relevant ‘right of residence’ for the purposes of article 7(1)(a) of the Directive; and pregnancy had deliberately been… [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:37 am by tracey
Adedoyin v Secretary of State for the Home Department: [2012] EWCA civ 939;  [2012] WLR (D)  206 “Where the Upper Tribunal had properly directed itself as to its approach on an appeal from a determination of the First–tier Tribunal and had arrived at a conclusion which was open to it, the decision of the Upper Tribunal contained no material error of law and so the Court of Appeal should not allow an appeal from that decision, even if the court… [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 8:40 am by becassidy
C|M|LAW’s own Professor Chris Sagers’ new book United States v. [read post]