Search for: "United States v. Little" Results 1521 - 1540 of 10,934
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2015, 8:14 am by Kent Scheidegger
On Thursday, the Supreme Court of the United States denied a stay to Florida murderer Jerry Correll, who was an exemplar of why anything less than death is inadequate for some killers. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 5:00 pm
In the meantime, in my judgment, the Board's structure violates the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:30 am
But State Farm has not tendered any of its UIM coverage, so necessarily has been named and served as an adverse party in Cooper v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:08 am by Eric Goldman
The judge says the SAD Scheme “is the most efficient way to address the epidemic of counterfeit goods being sold in the United States on the internet by defendants located outside the United States. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 8:24 am by Steve Vladeck
United States was, as Evan Lee put it, “The Battle of the Canons,” the first argument in Torres v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:35 pm by Colin O'Keefe
We touched on it a bit yesterday, but today's roundup is quite heavy on United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:08 pm
 And, in the United States, that totally works.But what if the person flees to Mexico? [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 3:53 pm
   Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm by Record on Appeal
Royal Dutch Petroleum – an Alien Tort Statute case involving a violation of the law of nations and whether a corporation can be a defendant in an Alien Tort Statute action;  United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 11:52 am
  The state contends that Longoni was relying only on Rast’s notes; Smith contended that he relied on Rast’s report as well as on her notes, and treated them essentially as a unit. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 11:51 am by Cyrus Farivar
The companies, which include Apple, Google, and Microsoft among many others, argue that the current state of the law, which distinguishes between "content" (which requires a warrant) and "non-content" (which does not) "make[s] little sense in the context of digital technologies. [read post]