Search for: "United States v. Peoples" Results 1521 - 1540 of 22,853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2020, 2:53 pm by Unknown
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act)Western Refining Southwest, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:20 am by Rahul Bhagnari
Two years to the day after the Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am by Will Baude
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Michael McConnell, Sam Bray, and I recently completed and posted the 2023 online supplement to our constitutional law casebook: The Constitution of the United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 8:05 pm by Sex Crimes
Reason Magazine has an interesting article supporting the Respondent in the upcoming United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 2:10 pm by Cindy Cohn
But the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit accepted the government’s argument that the court cannot yet decide whether the Fourth Amendment is violated when the government taps into the Internet cables carrying the communications of millions of Americans. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 3:45 am
Extremely interesting case from the 11th Circuit today, United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 2:05 pm
The Volokh Conspiracy has a post on A Pronouncing Dictionary of the Supreme Court of the United States: Gene Fidell (Yale Law School) and some of his students are putting together an article tentatively titled A Pronouncing Dictionary of the Supreme Court of the United States, which will basically help people know the standard ways of pronouncing Supreme Court case names (such as City of Boerne v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:49 pm
In her state of the state address today, Hawaii Governor Linda Lingle had this to say about the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:59 am by Eric Osterberg
People’s United Bank, 672 F.3d 1, 9 n.11 (1st Cir. 2012) (finding it unnecessary, and declining, to decide issue); Southern Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 11:59 pm by Eric Osterberg
People’s United Bank, 672 F.3d 1, 9 n.11 (1st Cir. 2012) (finding it unnecessary, and declining, to decide issue); Southern Co. v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am by seo
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]