Search for: "United States v. Provident National Bank" Results 1521 - 1540 of 2,056
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2010, 4:43 pm by Steve Matthews
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:49 am
In so doing, the report aims to provide practical guidance to States, DFIs, and other relevant actors on how to strengthen protection and respect for human rights through DFI financing, in line with the UNGPs. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:07 am by Marty Lederman
(The United States is not a State Party to the treaty, but most European nations are, including the UK, France, and Germany.) [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am by Kristian Soltes
Now that China’s digital-currency efforts are gathering momentum, officials at the Treasury, State Department, Pentagon and National Security Council are bolstering their efforts to understand the potential implications, the people said. [read post]
  First, Daniels mentions the United States Supreme Court’s (the “Supreme Court”) rulings in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
National Australia Bank to have the case dismissed. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
National Australia Bank to have the case dismissed. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by Maggie Mills
Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property, understood by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to “shed light” on customary sovereign-immunity rules, provides no exception that would permit the seizure of Russian central bank assets. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 6:48 am by Thalia Kruger
” Further, relying on Articles 10 and 19 of the United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property (“UNCJIS”), the claimant argued that the states cannot claim immunity in case of commercial transactions and the UNCJIS expressly restricts a Foreign State from invoking sovereign immunity against post-judgment measures, such as attachment against the property of the State in case of international… [read post]