Search for: "Urbanic v. Urbanic" Results 1521 - 1540 of 2,632
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2009, 9:05 pm
Dept. of Housing & Urban Dev., 717 F.2d 929, 931 (4th Cir. 1983) (quoting Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 3:54 am by Francis Davey
Particularly worrying (to landlords) was the decision in Philipps v Francis (discussed very clearly by J) which seemed to say that landlords ought to consult on pretty much everything that came their way. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:26 am
Lexington–Fayette Urban County Government, 175 S.W.3d 569 (Kentucky Supreme Court 2005). [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm by Giles Peaker
As famously expressed by Knight Bruce V-C in Walter v Selfe (1851) 4 De G & Sm 315, 322, the question is whether the interference ought to be considered a material inconvenience “not merely according to elegant or dainty modes and habits of living, but according to plain and sober and simple notions among the English people”; see also Barr v Biffa Waste Services Ltd (2013) QB 455, para 36(ii). [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:54 pm by Ilya Somin
And the court said that in the context of a taking of property that was done pursuant to a broad-scale urban development plan. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:42 pm by admin
  Detroit was the scene for a landmark eminent-domain case, Poletown v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:30 am by Nick Farr
It's ironic that, even as we see the federal government assert its authority over local affairs in legislation such as PPACA and cases like United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Claire Hill
In West Virginia v. [read post]