Search for: "V-lawyer" Results 1521 - 1540 of 67,852
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2011, 3:09 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 5:54 am
The RIAA lawyers are seeking an adjournment of the appellate argument scheduled to be conducted on May 19th at 2:00 PM in Manhattan in Lava Records v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:39 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:39 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:09 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, the Supreme Court held that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused who had no access to a lawyer while he was being questioned as a detainee at a police station was a violation of his rights under ECHR, arts 6(1), (3)(c). [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 7:17 am by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court this morning went back into the area of criminal defense lawyers giving bad advice on the immigration consequences of a conviction, a can of worms it opened in its 2010 decision of Padilla v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:15 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP. v Duane Reade (2012 NY Slip Op 05889): The New York Appellate Division has held that 3 emails between a lawyer and a corporate client set forth a fee agreement between the two parties. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:22 pm by On behalf of Bankruptcy Legal Group
That was the Supreme Court's ruling this week in the case of Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
 Lawyer Life Podcast 4.The Every Lawyer 5. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 11:06 am by Stacy
Patent lawyers generally salivate when the Federal Circuit (first stop for all your patent appellate needs) hands down an opinion. [read post]