Search for: "Ward v. Ward" Results 1521 - 1540 of 2,527
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2019, 2:34 pm by Sandy Levinson
Jackson (Harvard)Ayelet Shachar (Max Planck/Toronto)Kristen Stilt (Harvard)Sujit Choudhry (WZB Berlin)Session IV: Constitutional Identity, a panel in honor of Gary Jacobsohn4:00pm-5:45pmChair: Jeffrey Tulis (Texas)Ran Hirschl (Toronto)Heinz Klug (Wisconsin)Hanna Lerner (Tel Aviv)Monika Polzin (Augsburg)With comments by Gary Jacobsohn (Texas)Saturday, February 23Session V: The Trump Phenomenon: American Exceptionalism or a Global… [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:58 am
Pagliaro, Chapter 16 “Class Actions,” in Haig, Business and Commercial Litigation in Federal Courts, §§ 16:1 et seq. (2d ed.). [2] Montgomery Ward & Co. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 12:49 pm
AmeriKat Annsley Merelle Ward is happy to report that the the European Commission has relaunched a call for tenders for a study on SPCs. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 6:32 am by Garrett Hinck
Shane Reeves and Ward Narramore argued that the U.N. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 1:15 pm by Jack Pringle
Using “Part I, Section A, Subsection 1” to organize a brief may work in a paper document when the judge can discern that an “A” probably corresponds to “Part I” rather than “Part V. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 4:46 am by Marty Lederman
It's this: "[T]he president would derive authority [to borrow in violation of the law] from his paramount duty to ward off serious threats to the constitutional and economic system. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am by Dave
  Mr Yavuz conceded the proprietary estoppel point but appealed the other two points.This is a classic land registration problem question (for our student readers) and the Court of Appeal judgment and reasoning (Lloyd LJ, with whom Ward and Kitchin LJJ both agreed) make for interesting reading. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am by Dave
  Mr Yavuz conceded the proprietary estoppel point but appealed the other two points.This is a classic land registration problem question (for our student readers) and the Court of Appeal judgment and reasoning (Lloyd LJ, with whom Ward and Kitchin LJJ both agreed) make for interesting reading. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
The Second Department's decision accepted MHS's argument without elaboration and vacated the order dismissing the petition, writing as follows: A claim for dissolution of a foreign limited liability company is one over which the New York courts lack subject matter jurisdiction (see Rimawi v Atkins, 42 AD3d 799; Matter of Porciello v Sound Moves, 253 AD2d 467; Matter of Warde-McCann v Commex, Ltd., 135 AD2d 541). [read post]