Search for: "Washington v. U.s.*"
Results 1521 - 1540
of 1,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2011, 1:59 am
Thousands of bits and pieces of seemingly innocuous information can be analyzed and fitted into place to reveal with startling clarity how the unseen whole must operate (Halkin v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 6:08 pm
" The case is now on appeal to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:50 am
Fischer v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 4:35 pm
(See, e.g., Liparota v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 11:20 am
[6] Gravel v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:11 pm
Mauia v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:01 am
District Court for the District of Columbia denied a motion for preliminary injunction challenging a 70-year old federal ban on campaign contributions from government contractors in Wagner v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:15 pm
Department of Justice, Washington, DC) for the FTA and DOT, presented the defendants’ arguments. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:53 am
State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 11:03 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:36 pm
” To “defraud the United States” has a specific meaning under U.S. case law: According to Hammerschmidt v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
APFEL KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OFJENNER & BLOCK LLP PUBLIC ADVOCACY601 13th Street N.W. 100 Fair Oaks Lane, Ste. 301 Washington, DC 20005 Frankfort, KY 40601(202) 639-6000 (502) 564-3948 November 5, 2007 *Counsel of Record I. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 11:29 am
Morison (as well as Carpenter v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:03 am
In a 2014 Wall Street Journal piece co-authored with John Yoo, entitled “An Obsolete Nuclear Treaty Even Before Russia Cheated,” Bolton criticized the Obama administration for “engaging in contortions to save the INF” in the face of renewed Russian aggression and called on Washington to withdraw from the treaty. [read post]
Constructive Ambiguity of the Budapest Memorandum at 28: Making Sense of the Controversial Agreement
7 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
However, the security issue proved to be the thorniest in negotiations, considering the Ukrainian Parliament’s refusal to sign off on nothing less than legally binding security guarantees, as well as the United States’s and Russia’s joint resistance to Washington’s ironclad security guarantees to former Soviet republics akin to ones the United States provides to its allies. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am
The relevant part of the law, codified at 50 U.S.C. [read post]
6 May 2021, 12:23 pm
” So too likely would the burning of a Washington, D.C., police officer’s car. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
The Fufeng case generated significant national security and geopolitical debate in Washington given the proximity of the land to the Grand Forks Air Force Base.[1] These debates rapidly radiated beyond the beltway to state legislatures. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 1:16 pm
Spotify AB v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
Glebe v. [read post]
