Search for: "Weeks v. State of Me." Results 1521 - 1540 of 7,293
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2019, 11:12 am
 In 'Zervos v Picasso, or copyright v droit d'auteur' , GuestKat Antonella Gentile offers a post on the decision in Zervos v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
Specifically, Syed argued that the State failed to disclose potentially exculpatory evidence (a fax cover sheet disclaiming the reliability of the cell phone records), which violated the State’s duty imposed by Brady v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am by Thorsten Bausch
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 1:01 pm by Kalvis Golde
“Believe me, we’re not complaining,” he insists. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:15 pm by Eric Goldman
Those lawsuits produced a couple of important RTBF-related ECJ rulings this week that I hope to address in a future blog post. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:50 am by JacksonWhite Law
Ashelee Weeks was always very attentive with sending me all updates and talking to me about my case . [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Carolina Attorneys
But “in an abundance of caution,” the State’s attorney suggested continuing the proceedings until the beginning of the following week in case Defendant was able by that time to return to the courtroom. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am by Carolina Attorneys
” Defendant self-reported he used crack cocaine twice a week from 2005 through his arrest. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 2:39 am by Orin S. Kerr
The Supreme Court's new Term will begin next week with a fascinating criminal law case, Kahler v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:27 pm by David Post
  On July 24, 1974 a unanimous Supreme Court ordered Nixon to turn over the tapes in (the aptly-named) US v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 6:05 am by Joel R. Brandes
Father also stated in the motion that “it is true that [Mother] can freely decide where she will live with my minor child” and argued that the violation of the third clause arose from Mother’s “refus[al] to give me true and necessary information of her whereabouts for me to exercise my rights as a parent. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:16 pm by Florian Mueller
Time Warner's petition raises two distinct issues: the one relating to apportionment and one about the written-description requirement.Last week, Intel filed an amicus curiae brief in support of the first part (apportionment) of the cert petition.Both the petition and the amicus brief place particular emphasis on a 135-year-old Supreme Court ruling: In Garretson v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:04 pm
  I talked about that earlier this week, and have noticed it in several of his opinions. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:28 pm by David Oscar Markus
Also in Tallahassee, Miami lawyers Tara Kawass and Chris DeCoste have started trial in State v. [read post]