Search for: "Wells v. Social Security Administration" Results 1521 - 1540 of 1,913
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2012, 5:38 am by INFORRM
While there were not too many defamation claims that went to judgment in the last 12 months, the media did not do too well. [read post]
22 May 2012, 5:17 am by admin
The SSA-1099 that is provided by the Social Security Administration always has both the benefits received as well as the amount of a worker's compensation offset for that particular year. [read post]
22 May 2012, 5:17 am by admin
The SSA-1099 that is provided by the Social Security Administration always has both the benefits received as well as the amount of a worker's compensation offset for that particular year. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:45 am by Randy Barnett
The bottom line here is that the Obama Administration and the health care law are not the New Deal and Social Security, even though liberals keep imagining that they are. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:20 am
” Finally, said the court, the fact that Rice's application for, and receipt of, Social Security disability insurance benefits subsequent to the termination of his employment does not, as a matter of law, preclude a finding that Corrections had unlawfully discriminated against Rice. [read post]
9 May 2012, 12:13 pm
If the Social Security Administration (SSA) were to compile a list of the most important rules for its Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) to follow in considering a disability claim, somewhere near the top would be the treating physician rule, which provides that an opinion by a claimant's treating physician is given controlling weight if it is well-supported by medically acceptable clinical and laboratory diagnostic techniques and is not inconsistent… [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:52 am by Roger Alford
We may only belatedly realize the consequences of economic and social transformation on constitutional doctrine. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:15 am by Mandelman
  Well, since I see no other explanation for your mutual silence on the subject, I thought I’d offer both of you some insight and advice about your respective 2012 campaigns. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:43 pm by Steve Davies
Lynn Winmill had relied incorrectly on a 1989 Supreme Court decision that dealt with “a very unusual type of social security case” (Sullivan v. [read post]