Search for: "X, Y " Results 1521 - 1540 of 4,306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2012, 4:15 pm by Nancy Rapoport
  ("School X must be better than School Y, because School X has been ranked more highly than School Y for years. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 9:00 pm
Depuis l'entrée en vigueur de la CBE 2000, ce type d'invention peut être protégé par une revendication du type "Substance X pour traiter la maladie Y" (Art 54(5) CBE). [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 5:30 am
So various friends of mine have found that if X decides not to keep displaying the fact that she is married to Y (for example), FB sends a note to all your friends (or "friends") saying "X ended her relationship with Y". [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:47 pm
  Never mind how that happened (okay, Kerr-McGee paid the royalty percentage on $X - $ Y when it should have paid it on $X -- with the Y representing fees K-M forked over to the buyer). [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 7:48 am
I associate myself with the sentiments and frustration expressed by Munby J in In Re X & Y (ibid) which I expect is shared by the other family judges, not only those in the Family Division. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 1:18 pm
I am going to argue Y and show how brilliant I am. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 11:55 am
Hughes writes of the problems law firms have with the X and Y generations. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 11:15 pm by dave
No matter what the fact pattern if you have an A or B, a X or Y, one wins, one loses. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 3:52 am
However the following formats of claims are available for protecting such inventions:‘X for use in a method of treating Y’‘X for use in a method of diagnosing Y’However ‘X’ must be a substance, and cannot be a device. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 11:10 pm by So
Si tienen X carro, nos avergonzamos del nuestro y de pronto un carro nuevo se vuelve prioridad. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 5:20 am by Rita Handrich
As two Baby Boomers, it has been fascinating for us to see the parallels between our (admittedly hazy) recollections of our own initial entry to the workplace and the experience of Generation X and now that of Generation Y. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 5:30 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
“Una persona que desea enviar una carta a X generalmente la enviará directamente a X en un lugar donde X se encuentra habitualmente”, en lugar de enviarla “De forma indirecta, como por ejemplo dirigiéndolo a un tercero que, se espera que luego lo enviará al destinatario”, como lo hicieron los demandantes en este caso, señala la demanda. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
The internal affairs doctrine is a choice of law rule under which a court will apply the law of the state of the subject entity’s formation (lex incorporationis) rather than the law of the jurisdiction where suit is brought (lex fori) to governance disputes and other internal conflicts concerning rights and duties among the entity, its owners and managers. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 2:58 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
The post Recently arrested Morgan Wallen says he’s ‘not proud’ of behavior appeared first on J&Y Law Firm. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:27 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
The post Fundraiser aims to support Sacramento Republic FC captain’s family as son undergoes heart surgery appeared first on J&Y Law Firm. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm by So
Si hoy haces X y ganas 20, quizá para salir adelante mañana tengas que hacer X,L y M para ganar 18. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:10 am
What this means is that Parent X is asking the court to impute income to Parent Y, then Parent X must present evidence as to why the income of Y should be imputed, such as providing proof of the medical degree. [read post]