Search for: "v. Smith" Results 1521 - 1540 of 16,211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2011, 11:23 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Constitutional Law Eighth Amendment; sexual reassignment surgery [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:56 am by sally
“Read the full judgment from the UK Supreme Court that found that British troops deployed abroad are not protected by the Human Rights Act outside of military bases. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 6:52 am by Daily Record Staff
Torts — Causation — Expert testimony An intellectually disabled woman gave a number of inconsistent explanations about how she had fallen and injured herself on a bus. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by SupremeCourtHaiku
Pharma “detailers” Considered “outside salesmen” No overtime due Opinion:  pdf  html [read post]
2 May 2018, 12:42 pm
California passes a statute that says that if you produce medical waste in California, you have to burn it, not just dump it somewhere. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 9:28 am
You're sitting in your car, minding your own business, in the parking lot of a motel. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 11:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
With the able assistance of UCI's IP clinic, led by Jack Lerner, I worked on an amicus brief in this case arguing that fair use should continue to be a flexible standard that accommodates various types of transformativeness. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:36 pm
"Defendant and another man went to a drug dealer’s home for the purpose of purchasing a quarter-pound of methamphetamine. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 11:54 am
Everything about this is depressing.Defendant has an incredibly sad -- indeed, at times, monstrous -- childhood. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:16 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: (August 9 2013) Appellants_ Opening Brief Answering Brief 11-8-13 Lower court materials here. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 11:56 am
My thought is that the various Ninth Circuit judges here are each trying to make a point.Judge Bumatay, joined by five other judges, would grant the petition for rehearing en banc, and explain at length (35+ single-spaced pages) why they think the panel got the decision wrong and (perhaps) why the Supreme Court should take the case up and reverse. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 8:17 am
Knolls Atomic Power Lab, et al., limited to the question asking whether, under the Court’s 2005 decision in Smith v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 8:59 am
Smith (Absolute Immunity; Whether Trial Court Properly Concluded That Plaintiff's Claims Against Defendant Insurer Were Barred by Absolute Immunity Because They Arose Out of Communications Made in Course of Judicial Proceedings); Pizzoferrato v. [read post]