Search for: "A. J. B." Results 1541 - 1560 of 17,279
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2022, 1:34 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   The plaintiff alleges that the defendants violated Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
This post assesses the Solicitor General’s argument, in New York v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:47 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Four days ago, when I sat down to write this article, my plan was to feature a decision from Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrea J. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 10:48 am by Lawrence Solum
  The word "may" is used in Rule 13(b) to indicate that defendants have discretion to decide whether or not to bring permissive counterclaims. [read post]
22 Oct 2022, 12:38 pm by Drew Falkenstein
The rule outlines prevention and control measures that must be taken in processing facilities to reduce the risk of contamination of ready-to-eat products.[5] B. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 3:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
[The facts are complicated, and involve a good deal more than just disagreement as to gender identity; but it seems to me like an important controversy.] [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 4:15 am by Peter Lamb
Ponnan J quoted the following, with approval:“It is not necessary for a claimant to have to institute an action or, where property has been sold, to proceed against the Admiralty Fund or to proceed to judgment before being entitled to have its claim taken into account in the distribution of the fund. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 2:38 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2022 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Practical Guide to Successful Intellectual Property Valuation and Transactions by Alexander Puutio€ 135 Internet Law: A Concise Guide to Regulation Around the World … [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Furthermore, the principle of vertical stare decisis does not contemplate that intermediate appellate courts, let alone trial courts, can “distinguish” Supreme Court decisions out of existence: compare the reasons of Brown J (dissenting) in R. v Kirkpatrick, 2022 SCC 33, [2022] SCJ No 33 (QL). [read post]