Search for: "Anthony v. State" Results 1541 - 1560 of 4,692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The text of the decision, DiBattista v County of Westchester, is set out below:   DiBattista v County of Westchester Decided on July 29, 2008 Supreme Court, Westchester County Carmine DiBattista, ANTHYONY EGIZIACO, KATHERINE JONES, ANTHONY P. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The text of the decision, DiBattista v County of Westchester, is set out below:   DiBattista v County of Westchester Decided on July 29, 2008 Supreme Court, Westchester County Carmine DiBattista, ANTHYONY EGIZIACO, KATHERINE JONES, ANTHONY P. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The text of the decision, DiBattista v County of Westchester, is set out below:   DiBattista v County of Westchester Decided on July 29, 2008 Supreme Court, Westchester County Carmine DiBattista, ANTHYONY EGIZIACO, KATHERINE JONES, ANTHONY P. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:03 pm by Michel-Adrien
In the tumultuous final week of the 2011-2012 Term, the Court determined 'campaign issues' such as illegal immigration (Arizona v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:04 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Justices Anthony M. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am by Marissa Miller
University of Texas at Austin and the arguments in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 3:16 am by Michael Lowe
  The Supreme Court of the United States defined what is considered illegal obscenity in what has become known as “the Miller test” from Miller v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 11:44 am by Rory Little
United States), that the Justices were simply tired from the first argument, in Yates v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 10:37 am by Andrew Trask
The Court stated: “We hold today … that an unaccepted settlement offer has no force. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Joshua Matz
United States, a case that presents questions about the relationship between religious speech and political speech for purposes of tax exemptions. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 2:16 am by Peter Mahler
The agreement did not state that time was of the essence with regard to the ordering of the appraisal. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 9:14 am
LaPorte County Department of Child Services (NFP) Anthony Davis v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 1:54 am
Here are the notable closing paragraphs of this opinion from the Utah Supreme Court in Archuleta v. [read post]