Search for: "B. v. S."
Results 1541 - 1560
of 52,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
Accordingly, the Appellate Division so modified the Supreme Court's judgment with respect to Officer A.In contrast, the Appellate Division said Supreme Court "properly determined, however, that Respondent's determination not to provide [Officer B] with a defense was arbitrary and capricious, noting that the Respondent's determination concerning Officer B was based on its conclusion that Officer B was acting outside the scope… [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 7:48 pm
" So states the opinion announcing the judgment of the court that the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania issued Friday in Eiser v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:27 pm
But here's the kicker - Scalia then quotes Arizona v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 8:26 am
The Court held that “[f]ederal law ([8 U.S.C.] 1227(a)(2)(B)(i) . . . did not authorize Mellouli’s removal. [read post]
22 May 2009, 4:02 am
Godoy v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 8:15 am
Wojciechowicz v. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 6:12 am
Rather, we focus on the court’s holdings concerning Central Bank and § 10(b) liability. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 6:06 am
In Williams v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 2:00 pm
In Wisconsin v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:00 am
In Friedman v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 4:59 pm
In B, C & Ors v Chief Constable of Police Service of Scotland & Ors [2019] CSOH 48, the Outer House of Scotland’s Court of Session has answered “Yes”. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
In McIntosh v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 4:09 am
Moskin considers the B&B v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:38 pm
Stern v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 8:15 pm
See Avilez v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 6:17 am
As described in the petitioner’s motion seeking certiorari, the case presents the question whether, under the Court’s 2011 Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 9:35 pm
Bridges v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 2:42 pm
Watkins v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 2:15 am
It's a rarity for an an appeal against the making of a liability order to be successful, but that's what happened in Bird v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor [2008] EWHC 3159 (Admin).The Facts: The Child Support Agency made an assessment and informed the father that he was to pay it using Transcash. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 11:19 am
Thompson v. [read post]