Search for: "Best v. State Bar"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 5,423
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2019, 9:57 am
See Klein v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:54 am
The federal anti-kickback statute bars hospitals from paying doctors for referrals. [read post]
30 May 2019, 6:00 am
Burwell, for a 6-3 majority, Roberts rejected ACA opponents’ claim that a four-word statutory phrase barred tax credit premium subsidies on state-level exchange marketplaces run by the federal government’s website, Healthcare.gov. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:00 am
” State of Illinois v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:28 am
The statute reads in part: “(V)iolation of a criminal statute, ordinance or regulation by a plaintiff which contributed to said injury, death or damage, shall be considered as evidence of negligence of that plaintiff, but the violation of said statute, ordinance or regulation shall not as a matter of law and for that reason alone, serve to bar a plaintiff from recovery. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am
Flourshings Plus, Inc., d/b/a the Tom Cat Bar & Grill, 2019 WL 1958284 (S.D. [read post]
27 May 2019, 1:37 am
During the parliamentary debates, it was stated that this text was in line with “the spirit of the Civil Code and European texts“[15]. [read post]
26 May 2019, 12:29 pm
Uncomfortable with that instruction, Hillman contacted the Texas Center for Legal Ethics and the State Bar of Texas’s hotline seeking ethical guidance. [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:34 am
The onus has shifted to the state to justify an interference with a right. [read post]
20 May 2019, 3:22 am
" See Miranda v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 1:28 pm
The Court of Appeals merely decided the State Bar had made a prima facie case that would avoid dismissal under the Texas Anti-SLAPP law. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Many, at best, pay lip service to the Arthur Andersen fee factors, or at least some of them. [read post]
17 May 2019, 2:49 pm
,Exxon Corp. v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 4:58 am
See, Montana v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
My best guess is that there are not four votes for plenary review there. [read post]
14 May 2019, 10:57 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am
It’s just disingenuous at best in endorsing a distinction between nondigital and digital copies that does not make sense of the Supreme Court’s interpretation of “origin,” especially in light of the Office’s (correct) position in discussions of first sale that a digital copy stored on a computer is a reproduction. [read post]
12 May 2019, 1:01 pm
Another decision is Public Citizen v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 6:20 am
A. v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Supreme Court on the basis that US courts lacked jurisdiction in that case (case opinion here: Kiobel v. [read post]
