Search for: "Brown v Brown" Results 1541 - 1560 of 12,860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2017, 12:56 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
” When you think of Supreme Court cases, you typically imagine the big ones, cases like Brown v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:32 am by Aurora Barnes
Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. 16-1461 Issue: Whether, under Kiobel v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 1:21 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Yesterday, the National Whistleblower Center filed a “friend of court” brief in Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 1:21 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Yesterday, the National Whistleblower Center filed a “friend of court” brief in Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 8:07 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the letter and accompanying materials: fb-ltr2-doj-re-ndn-civil-rights-sept-6-2016 8th-circuit-opinion-upheld-square-hook-chippewa-treaty-rights-2-10-2015 bissonette-cass-app-brief-4-26-2016 buddie-greene-v-mn-dhs-commissioner-8-28-2008-mn-s-ct davis-v-mn-petition_for_cert joel-roy-v-mn-petition_for_cert notice-of-change-oral-panel-composition-8-10-2016 petition_for_cert-kevin-beaulieu-nov-25-2011 tunheim-memo-op-order-us-v-brown-et-al-11-25-13 [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
David Kenneth Pye, an independent scholar who holds a PhD from the University of California, San Diego, has posted Before Civil Rights Was in Vogue: The Black Lawyer Before Brown:Scholars cannot become too infatuated with Equal Protection arguments. [read post]
25 May 2022, 1:09 pm by JURIST Staff
  On Friday May 13th, the Supreme Court of Canada rendered its judgment in the case of R v Brown, rejecting the constitutionality of section 33.1 of the Criminal Code, a provision removing “extreme self-induced intoxication akin to automatism” as a defence to otherwise criminal acts requiring voluntariness when those acts involved an element of assault or bodily interference. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 10:10 am by Rachael Samberg
Brown, (671 F.3d 1052), which affirmed the district court’s determination that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional (Perry v. [read post]