Search for: "C. G., Matter of"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 3,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2024, 2:07 am
As the Court of Justice had recently clarified in 2020 that the EUIPO must take into account fundamental rights when examining trade mark applications (see Fack Ju Göthe, C-240/18 P), this case gave rise to an opportunity to expand upon the principles of examination of fundamental rights in the context of absolute grounds. [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 12:10 pm
[6] §2(g) [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 3:30 am
These C&DIs go a long way to help address those practices. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:35 am
“For purposes of social welfare legislation, such as the FLSA, ‘employees are those who as a matter of economic reality are dependent upon the business to which they render service. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 3:05 pm
" In the Matter of the Search of: 3817 W. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 6:30 am
It didn’t matter that she didn’t speak a word. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:41 am
Interpreting what the word “found” means in 17 USC 512(g). * In the Matter of Subpoena of Internet Subscribers of Cox Communications, LLC and Coxcom LLC, 2023 WL 6907124 (D. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
§ 5104(e)(2)(G), after entering the Capitol on January 6, 2021. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 2:24 pm
Comment g suggests a completely unworkable proof scheme for trial. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:26 am
Bagley"Robert C. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
Bagley"Robert C. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
This post summarizes cases from the North Carolina Supreme Court from February 28, 2020. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
., Ltd. lost a trade mark infringement case regarding its ‘Double C’ logo in China.Katfriend Thomas Key reports on the recent decision of the US Supreme Court in Iancu v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling.Foundation is a 501(c)(3) corporation that opposes public employee unions and the Appellate Division's decision notes that "As part of its mission, it contacts represented public employees to inform them of their rights to opt out of union membership".An employee of Foundation had submitted a FOIL request [the "May request"] to DCAS. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 9:16 am
(For now; one of the trademark cases before the Supreme Court may change matters.) [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling.Foundation is a 501(c)(3) corporation that opposes public employee unions and the Appellate Division's decision notes that "As part of its mission, it contacts represented public employees to inform them of their rights to opt out of union membership".An employee of Foundation had submitted a FOIL request [the "May request"] to DCAS. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 5:40 am
P. 192.3(g) 5. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 6:09 am
C. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 11:22 am
§ 271(f) because software is not patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 May 2007, 10:59 am
Reference: ERISA § 206(d)(3)(C)(iv); IRC § 414(p)(2)(D) Must all QDROs have the same provisions? [read post]
