Search for: "Call v. State"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 55,363
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2018, 10:45 am
District Court for the District of South Carolina, Charleston Division, issued a nationwide injunction to the Trump administration’s so-called “Suspension Rule,” which called for the delayed effective date of the Obama-era “waters of the United States rule” (or “WOTUS Rule”). [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 1:34 pm
It's the unusual case that generates a uniform judicial call to arms for the modification of the Younger and/or Colorado River abstention doctrines. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:15 am
Baker v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 7:20 am
”2Campbell v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 8:51 pm
" The Board sustained the State's exception to that conclusion and, in support, cited its own precedents that making a false application or submitting a false testimony for a Board proceeding are "clearly within the practice of medicine. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:19 pm
United States and United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 12:12 pm
Clearly, the United States Constitution guarantees the criminally accused the right to counsel. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 7:06 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently decided State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
More recently, however, the European Commission has been very reluctant to go after those aggressively enforcing their SEPs (such as in Nokia v. [read post]
US Supreme Court turns away challenge to male-only draft, grants review in second state secrets case
8 Jun 2021, 12:04 pm
FBI v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court wrote its Hollingsworth v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 4:04 am
In Caminiti v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am
State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
Yesterday’s argument in State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 10:23 am
’ Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Instead, they have invoked Roberts’ opinion more opportunistically and selectively to reinforce their existing, full-throated arguments calling DACA (and by extension, similar initiatives) more fundamentally into question altogether. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 11:54 am
Armed with Article VI, one of the treaty parties, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, filed suit, asking the federal court to declare the United States in breach of its treaty obligations and to order the United States to engage in good-faith negotiations. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:47 am
Enter Houchin v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 7:50 am
In Bang v. [read post]
TX4: State didn't call officer and relied on his report and failed in its burden of proving exigency
18 Feb 2012, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
