Search for: "Child v. Child" Results 1541 - 1560 of 31,278
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2023, 6:13 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This is one of those difficult cases that arises from child neglect proceeding and false charges against a parent who then brings a lawsuit against a city agency for damages over the trauma of being separated from their children.The case is Dabah v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:22 am by Phil Dixon
The new law seems likely to be challenged as unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment and the cases interpreting Grady v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
& C. 4th 251, 257 (2003), or that the TV program Born Innocent led some underage viewers to sexually attack a small child in copying a scene shown on the program, Olivia N. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 4:48 am by Emma Kent
Accordingly, in the recent case of Local Authority v S & Ors [2023] EWFC 85, the court reinstated the high threshold for removing the child care from a parent. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 2:37 am by laura
Accordingly, in the recent case of Local Authority v S & Ors [2023] EWFC 85, the court reinstated the high threshold for removing the child care from a parent. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
” The absence of an “operative parent-child relationship on which she reasonably relied,” guided the affirmance.Bet she objected to that ….# # #DECISIONMatter of Small v M. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
CHILD INSUFFICIENTLY COMPENSATED FOR BURNSAfter a New York County Supreme Court jury awarded a 16-year-old plaintiff $29,585.000 for past pain and suffering, and another $29,585,000 for future pain and suffering (over 54 years), together with 9% interest thereon, the City of New York, the New York City Department of Education, and other defendants, appealed to the Appellate Division, First Department.Sadly, the young plaintiff reportedly suffered “catastrophic injuries” during… [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
Doughty Street published the Statement in which the Defendant apologised for the invasion of privacy caused to the Claimant and his child and stated that the West Yorkshire Police had since revised its procedures and safeguards. [read post]