Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 16,690
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2022, 4:02 am
Here is the opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
I think it is somewhat telling that Jennifer’s caution leads her to try to ask if there are any real defenses for what I find one of the truly indefensible features of the Constitution—the allocation in the Senate of equal voting power by states. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 8:35 am
The Twitter v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 3:21 am
ilište u Zagrebu, Croatia, Universitatea Sapientia din municipiul Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici, Slovakia, Uniwersytet ? [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 11:06 am
Parker v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:55 pm
News In Slosberg v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am
State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 1:30 pm
In Huber v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:13 am
See Knake Jefferson at 34 (citing State ex rel, Okla Bar Ass’n v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 8:48 am
For decades, CBP and its predecessor agencies allowed Mexicans with border crossing cards to enter the United States to sell plasma. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
I think the United States crosses that threshold of democratic adequacy, even with the majoritarian weaknesses in contemporary constitutional institutions. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
New York State Liquor Authority[15] involved a New York law under which liquor distillers could not sell to wholesalers in New York except in accordance with a monthly price schedule that affirmed that prices in New York were no higher than the lowest prices charged in other states.[16] Healy v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 2:36 am
This article concentrates on seeking and enforcing civil protection measures in cross-border family conflicts. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 9:05 pm
Changes in the costs of transition or in the mix of shareholders in the firm’s register (green v. non-green) may lead the firm to renege on transition “pledges” when the time comes to incur significant costs. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:47 pm
That vessel permits a broad scope of discretionary decisions whether or not in conformity to expectations that is protected by international law, or, more specifically, by the structural nature of the state system with its ideology that states can do no wrong unless they are (eventually--and rarely) brought to account by other states. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 9:50 am
Supreme Court case Brady v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Unless a convention of the states assembled pursuant to Article V proceeds to ignore the language of Article V, the current structure of the Senate cannot be changed, and even permissible amendments will need the assent of 38 states. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 5:30 am
Because the Majority denied the defendants’ cross-motion in part and reinstated the Labor Law sec. 240 (1) claim, the order is non-final. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 8:00 am
Clanton v. [read post]
3 Sep 2022, 8:51 am
State Coll. [read post]
